Saturday, January 17, 2009

Fun with Plus/Minus, Part II: Do the Lakers Need a Point Guard?

Some observations from the fantastic Lakers-Magic game last night: 

• If you still don't think the Magic are legit title contenders, I don't know what to tell you. Here's Jameer Nelson (who had a MONSTER fourth-quarter from deep) after the game: "We're flying under the radar. Nobody's really noticed us. At the same time it's fine with us. Everybody in this locker room knows the type of team we have and knows what we're capable of." 

You know SVG is playing this "us against the doubters" stuff up every day. But the truth is, everybody following the league knows how good the Magic are. Everybody. You hear that Jameer? Dwight? I'm a Celtics fan, and I would be terrified to face your team in the playoffs. Kobe says Jameer's an All-Star, you just swept the Lakers and you're 32-and-freaking-8. We all believe. You can keep saying you're "under the radar," but you're all over the radar like the strawberry jam in "Spaceballs." 

• The most interesting question about the Lakers is this: Do they even need a point guard? The question needs to be asked after numbers surfaced at Basketball Value (via True Hoop) showing that Derek Fisher and Jordan Farmar have by far the worst adjusted plus/minus numbers on the team. (For the uninitiated: Adjusted plus/minus works like regular plus/minus, except the math involved takes into account the quality of the other nine guys on the floor with a particular player. The goal is to take away the credit a mediocre player might get for being in a a great starting unit or to give credit to the quality sub stuck with some subpar bench players. Here's a more detailed explanation). 

Let's exclude Farmar from the discussion for now, since he's been hurt for almost a month and has played just 28 percent of the team's minutes this year. Looking at Fisher, the regular plus/minus numbers rank him third on the Lakers at plus 252. That's good. Looking a little deeper, the defense performs a tiny bit worse with Fisher on the floor (less than a full point per 100 possessions, so not really significant), and Basketball Reference has him rated at the bottom of the roster in individual defense. The man Fisher guards also has a PER of 18 compared to his 14.9, so opposing point guards are out-playing Fisher overall. 

Fisher's an interesting offensive player He shoots a very nice percentage from deep (about 45 percent), but that's really all he does--and he need lots of space to do it. He takes about two foul shots per game, and his overall shooting percentage is 41 percent--meaning he's really clanking his two-point shots.

This all came to my mind last night when Jackson sent Vujacic in for Fisher with 4:15 left in the third and Orlando up 69-62. The lineup was Vujacic-Kobe-Gasol-Radmanovic-Odom. Kobe and Odom split the ball-handling duties, driving into the lane and creating havoc. Bryant hit a three and then drove-and-kicked to Radmanovic for two wide open bombs. Odom sliced through the lane once for a lay-up and then again to draw a shooting foul. 

After two minutes, the Lakers were ahead by 1. 

I'm not suggesting the Lakers are better without a traditional point guard. I'm only suggesting they might be, given who their traditional point guards are and the fact that Kobe is the team's primary creator. I think Phil needs to think very hard about whether Fisher should be on the court during crunch time--on either side of the ball. 

The counter, of course, is that the Lakers need somebody to spare Kobe some of the ball-handling duties so he's not tired down the stretch. And suggesting that championships can be won without a traditional point guard is blasphemous, even though the Lakers, Bulls and Rockets have won it all in the last 15 years without a point who dominates the ball or the assist numbers. 

Either way, it will be very interesting to see how Farmar plays (and how much) when he comes back from knee surgery, and what Phil does in the big moments of the biggest games. Then again, the way the Western Conference is shaping up, he may not need to worry about any of this until the Finals. 


  1. You're a Celtics fan too? Well, if you like the C's, can you check out my blog?

  2. Vujacic (aka "the Machine") can be considered a point guard, and sometimes brings the ball up the court when in the game.

    I'm with you in that the Lakers don't really need a true PG because Kobe and Odom handle the ball more than anyone on the team anyway. Fisher (when in the game) actually works as an offensive decoy, because teams have to pay attention to him on the 3-pt line. So, he actually plays as a spot up shooting guard most of the possessions.

    I also fully agree with you that he is a complete liability on defense, especially when refs aren't falling for his blatant flopping.

  3. also major Kudos for the Spaceballs reference...

  4. Glad people enjoyed the Spaceballs reference--20 plus years later, and that movie gets better every time I see it.

    Moose: I've seen your blog and like it a lot. A fellow Rondo obsessor.

  5. Havе you еver сonsidered writing an ebook or
    guest authoring on other websites? I have a blog basеd οn the same infоrmatiοn you discuѕs and wοuld reаlly liκe to have
    you share somе storiеs/infοrmation. I know my visitors
    ωould apprеciate your work. If you
    аre even remοtely intereѕted, feel
    frеe to shoot me an e-mail.

    my blog post ... bucket trucks
    Also see my page - buy bucket trucks

  6. I just lіke the valuаble informatіon уou ѕupplу to
    yοur агticleѕ. І will bookmаrk your weblog and tеst
    again here regularlу. Ι am гeаѕonаbly сertain I'll learn a lot of new stuff proper right here! Good luck for the next!

    Also visit my blog post ... lewisville tx landscaping

  7. Thanks for finally talking about > "Fun with Plus/Minus, Part II: Do the Lakers Need a Point Guard?" < Loved it!

    My blog :: how to
    buy сars at an auction